Week 122: Join the Ranks

Wikipedia maintains a list of Wikipedians by number of edits, i.e. a ranked list of the most active Wikipedia editors of all time. The list displays the top 5,000 editors and is updated on a daily basis.

Read More

Week 121: You're Watching The Watchers

Ever wonder how many editors are watching a particular article, or how many pageviews an article receives? If so, the "Number of watchers" and "Page view statistics" tools can be accessed by clicking on the "View history" tab at the top of any Wikipedia article.

Read More

Week 120: Assigning WikiBlame

In addition to revision history statistics, which provide auto-populated details about a Wikipedia article's past, users can view information about a page's history using the "Revision history search" tool, also available at the top of the page when you click through the "View history" tab.

Read More

Week 119: Historical Revisions

Revision history statistics provide information about the history of editable Wikipedia pages. Showing many facts about the article's past, including timestamps of the first and most recent edits, when the largest content chunks were added or removed (and by whom), the number of minor and anonymous edits, and frequency of activity.

Read More

Week 118: Give It a Rest Already

A variant of the expression "don't beat a dead horse", the short essay "Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass" advises editors not to revive a debate once it has come to a natural end. This is recommended regardless of whether the discussion ended in your favor, or the opposite, or came to a standstill with no major outcome.

Read More

Week 117: Defensive Editing

The essay "Writing for the opponent" (also known as "Writing for the enemy") describes a process for fairly and neutrally explaining someone else's point of view, even when it disagrees with your own. 

Read More

Week 116: All Wiki Do is Win

The essay "Wikipedia is not about winning" reminds editors that content and behavioral disputes are meant to be resolved through consensus, not by "winning" arguments. Egos are not helpful to Wikipedia's mission or its collaborative community, and users should accept decisions made by consensus.

Read More

Week 115: Cool as a Wikipedia Editor

When tens of thousands of editors are working together to build an encyclopedia, disputes are inevitable. The essay "Staying cool when the editing gets hot" reminds users that (at least in theory) editors contribute to Wikipedia for similar reasons, so you should respect people as you engage in conversations. Edit wars and personal attacks are inappropriate and counterproductive .

Read More

Week 114: America the Consistent?

As we continue our tour of Wikipedia's Manual of Style, we look at one thing you will see punctuated inconsistently throughout Wikipedia's massive array of articles: the very place many readers call home.

Read More