FAQ
If you're exploring how Wikipedia works—or how Beutler Ink can help you work within its rules—you're in the right place. Whether you're just getting started or already navigating the editing process, these answers are designed to help you move forward with clarity and confidence.
What is Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy?
Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy is one of the site's core content principles. It requires that articles be written without bias, presenting information fairly, proportionately, and based on reliable, independent sources.
How does Wikipedia define a reliable source?
Reliable sources are publications with editorial oversight, a reputation for accuracy, and independence from the subject being covered.
Why do independent sources matter more than company materials?
You may know your company's materials are accurate, well-written, and fact-checked. From your perspective, the content may be accurate and important. From Wikipedia's perspective, it still reflects your point of view.
What is "due and undue weight" in Wikipedia articles
Wikipedia’s due weight principle aims to ensure that topics and viewpoints are covered in proportion to the attention they’ve received in reliable, independent sources.
What counts as original research on Wikipedia?
Original research includes any new ideas, interpretations, data analysis, or conclusions that haven't already been published in reliable, independent sources, even if they’re accurate.
What are weasel words and why should I avoid them?
Weasel words are vague or sweeping phrases like "widely regarded," "it is believed," or "many people are saying" that imply consensus or authority without naming a source.
What is puffery and how does it affect Wikipedia articles?
Puffery, aka Wikipuffery, refers to promotional language that sounds impressive but lacks objective meaning, words like "innovative," "industry-leading," or "world-class."
How does Wikipedia handle biographies of living persons differently from other articles?
Wikipedia applies especially strict standards to articles about living individuals, due to the risk of harm to personal reputations—and livelihoods—from inaccurate or misleading information.