It depends mostly on scope, and it is usually structured differently than buyers expect: as an ongoing program rather than a one-time fix. Wikipedia work doesn't stay done. Articles keep changing, your company keeps changing, and the organizations that get lasting value treat Wikipedia the way they treat media monitoring, as a standing function rather than a project with an end date.
What drives cost is the scope and difficulty of the work, far more than the size of the company. A single stable article that needs attention every quarter sits at one end. A family of articles across several languages, an active dispute with editors, a crisis in progress, or a history of bad editing that has to be repaired first all cost more, because they take more expertise, more hours, and more patience with Wikipedia's processes.
One caution belongs in any conversation about price. Doing this work properly, in the open and with real sourcing, has a minimum cost. Offers far below that level are usually priced for secret editing, which is cheap until it gets caught.
Last updated August 30, 2026.
